Just as the way political incumbency has held and will always uphold an unwarranted, if not unfair, advantage over any and every attempt at political inauguration, feminism is dealt an identical uphill battle. Proposing and implementing change is difficult for humans to accept, and will always call for preservation and draw fear. At the heart of feminism comes an attempt at attaining a truly even playing field within humanity. That’s right; the term Feminism refers more to movements with intent to defend, then substantiate, demonstrate, exhibit, and then inaugurate an unbiased societal, political, and economic administrative system with equality and nonpartisan opportunities for women. Changing or altering traditional beliefs and customs is and has been no doubt the most difficult to change; thus, the heart of feminism and acceptance of feminist beliefs maintains a certain contention for challenging traditions, in this case political or diplomatic. Exposing the absence of a subjective female viewpoint and overall importance, the degradation of feminine matters, whether natural, artistic, corporate, managerial, or academic, alongside the unavailability of true sexual preference within an entire civilization provides the focal center of every Feminist’s reasoning. This relates to ecofeminism, goddess mythology, and environmental dangers in that every of these elements, as listed above, have been pertinent to better advancing a stronger and better defined civilization from which we all prosper. With focus on the topic (environmental dangers) and how it relates to ecofeminism and goddess mythology, we understand the psychological evolution.One environmental danger is frequently found in the mockery of everything male. Another, of course, has been the existence and maintenance of bigotry. By attempting to fight fire with fire, we get what we have had and no progress comes about. By tactfully and rationally trying techniques, trial and error, we find what does not work while also what successfully works. Historically, this has been our best teacher.As for another, strategic essential-ism; this theory sets all individual parts aside before they should learn to fit in, for whatever sense that makes. For another, utopian ideals, right alongside employing novel language, so as to promote some form of Jane Austen “experience” for all. These changes need to happen urgently, in the here-and-now, before anyone decides to feel justified at making another decision in order to further wrong the females of this (western) society. As for the ecological or environmental tie-in, humans are mammals. If humans forget and deny that, then humans will find themselves misplaced entirely; we depend on our objective and territorial nature, human nature, our environment, our Earth. To stifle any part of it will leave an insufficiency elsewhere. Surely evolution is happening, and has been happening, but to go against the grain only causes unwanted and unnatural repercussions. Correspondingly, though, throughout the years we have found ways to get along and get by, even with such an abundance (ten out of ten) Alpha-males -- even those which anger feminists. Likewise, since the capitalist uprising of the United States, due to names like Abigail Adams, Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Clementia Black, Elizabeth Blackwell, writer Kate Chopin, 19th Amendment in 1919 (women’s right to vote in the U.S.), mythology, then feminism, eco-feminism, and women’s liberation have been part of the next step in human evolution.*After reading this bit of KDP Select, sense will surely come of this following combination of words.Diversity as a Strategic Advantage: With a clear working definition of Diversity, and then by infiltrating it into the larger schematic of business ethics, operatives will gain by understanding “Diversity as a Strategic Advantage: It's about more than filling quotas, as such companies as Turner Broadcasting, IBM....